Pentecost 5B
June 28, 2015
Mark 5:21-43
When my
parents were expecting their first child, my brother, they talked about names
just like all expecting parents do. Like all parents, they considered many
factors: names they liked, names from their family history, names from the
Bible, and perhaps most importantly, names that would not lend themselves to
terrible nicknames once the kid hit school age. They finally decided on Luke –
a strong name, and a biblical one. Who could mess up Luke? And yet, once he
went off to school, guess what his friends start calling him? Puke. So much for
avoiding terrible nicknames.
Now, in Puke’s,
I mean Luke’s case, his nickname was offered in love by his friends, so no harm
done. But of course not all nicknames are this way. Often we are given
nicknames that are what we now would call bullying – names that are meant to
degrade a person, to bring them down, to make fun of them. And nicknames are
tough because they tend to stick. Perhaps even my talking about this right now
is making you squirm, remembering your own hurtful nicknames that some mean kid
of even a family member gave you that stuck, and it ruined your whole
childhood. Maybe it was a name linked to a characteristic, or maybe to just one
event. The boy who threw up in class. The girl who was too fat for the PE
uniforms. The boy who flunked out. The girl who got pregnant at 15. The boy
who’s poor.
Names and labels
are powerful things. As it turns out, the saying is wrong: sticks and stones
may break your bones, but words… can cut you to the core in a way that requires
years of therapy to
overcome. We all know this – often from personal experience
– and yet since the advent of language we have used our words to label and
name, for better or for worse. Just look at the poor hemorrhaging woman in our
Gospel lesson. That is how she is known: as the woman who has been bleeding for
12 years. Likely, this is the sort of bleeding that most women only endure a
few days once a month, and in this 1st century Jewish culture, that
time is a time when women are considered ritually unclean. They are
untouchable. They should not be in public during this time, lest someone else
touch them and become ritually unclean themselves. But this woman does not
endure this a mere few days a month; she has endured it consistently for 12
whole years. Because of this, she is also likely unable to have children,
making her even less in the eyes of her culture. So, by no fault of her own,
she has acquired several unwanted names and labels: the bleeding woman, the
woman who can’t conceive, the untouchable woman, the woman who can’t contribute
to society… And none of them is complimentary.
Why do we
feel the need to label others, anyway? Perhaps it is in an effort to make some
sense of a situation, especially a situation that makes us uncomfortable, or
that we can’t understand. By labeling something – an event, a person, whatever
– we are able to box it up neatly, talk more directly about it, find faults, or
solutions. Often, it also allows us, if we like or need, to remove ourselves
from the difficulty of the situation. It belongs to this other category, which
I have no part in.
I have been
thinking a lot about this the past week and a half, as our country continues to
mourn following the events in South Carolina last week. It hardly took a few
hours before the media was throwing around all kinds of labels. The shooter is
a racist. The shooter is a terrorist. The shooter is mentally ill. This is the
parents’ fault for raising him wrong. This happened in a church, so it is an
attack on Christianity. It’s the Confederate flag’s fault. This is the NRA’s
fault. This is the fault of people who are against gun – if those people had
all had guns, this wouldn’t have happened. Now, there may be truth in any number
of those statements. But the danger of jumping right to them is that it
prevents us from taking a moment to really see
the people involved. I certainly
have my opinions about the shooter, too, but
what would happen if, before we make assumptions about what kind of person he
is, and what kind of family raised such a monster, we took the time to really
see him, to understand him? It sounds horrifying in this case, right? Who would
want to get in the head of this guy? Well, let me tell you a few things to
humanize him: his family raised him in the church, in an ELCA church, in fact,
where he was baptized, confirmed, attended church camp, and still attended worship
regularly. His father attended worship twice a week. In his own manifesto,
Dylann Roof does not blame his parents, saying that they did not instill his
views in him, nor did he want them to bear any responsibility for his actions.
Suddenly, he is becoming someone who looks more like us: a good Lutheran boy
from a devout family, who wants to take responsibility for his own actions, but
who fell victim to being swayed by some perverse views on people different from
him. None of this is enough to keep me from shaking my head in sadness and
disbelief at what he did, but suddenly, he has become a person to me, and
slowly but surely the labels either fall away, or at least are offered with
slightly less vitriol.
Young Dylann and his father, submitted to NBC News by Dylann's ex-step-mother, Paige Mann |
I wonder how many people tried to
truly see the woman in our Gospel lesson, the one who is known by her ailment?
I wonder what was more painful for her: the disease itself, or living with the
consequences of it, or perhaps, living in a reality in which no one even tries
to truly see her, to know her, to hear her story, to understand her, to relate
to her? When she sees Jesus in the crowd, she probably suspects that he can
heal her hemorrhaging, but I wonder if the reason she reaches out to him, and
then presents herself to him when he turns around, is that she knows that here
is someone who can and who will truly see her, for all that she is. It does
take courage to be truly seen by someone – that is why it is “with fear and
trembling” that she presents herself – but perhaps she
knows, in some way, that
her true healing and restoration will only come when she is healed not only in
body, but also in spirit.
Jesus does see her. And when he does,
he calls her “daughter” – restoring her to community, restoring her to
wholeness. The word our translation translates here as “well” (as in, “your
faith has made you well”) can also be
translated as “whole”: “Daughter, your faith has made you whole.” Belonging and
wholeness – this is what Jesus offers to this woman, previously labeled in all
the wrong ways, now claimed publicly as a daughter of faith, and one who is
wholly a part of the kingdom.
Taking the time to truly see the
other may bring that other into wholeness and joy. But more importantly for us
today, is how it affects us: if we are able to suspend labels and name-calling
and putting people into a box, we will see people and situations more honestly
and clearly – and this will in turn allow us
to be changed, to be made whole like the woman in the Gospel story. As soon as
we smack a label on something, it is no longer our responsibility. Taking the
time to see and to know pushes us to examine ourselves, our
own actions, our own role.
And this is why our presiding bishop,
Bishop Elizabeth Eaton, has called Lutheran churches
around the country into a
day today of mourning and of repentance – for the ways we have benefitted from
a system so destructive or demeaning to people of color (you may have heard the
phrase, “white privilege” – this means that, because I am white, I will
probably not be pulled over for my skin color, and if I am, I will be treated
with respect. It means I can be pretty sure no one is going to come into our
Bible study and shoot us because of the color of our skin), for the times we
have made careless jokes or comments that actually cut away at who someone is
or their heritage, for turning the other way and ignoring our brothers and
sisters who are different from us, assuming that their problem is not our
problem.
ELCA Presiding Bishop, the Rev. Elizabeth Eaton |
President Obama spoke eloquently
about this in the powerful eulogy he gave at Rev. Pinkney’s funeral on Friday.
He said, “Whatever solutions we find will necessarily be incomplete. But it
would be a betrayal of everything Rev. Pinkney stood for, I believe, if we
allow ourselves to slip into comfortable silence again. Once the eulogies have
been delivered, once the TV cameras move on, to go back to business as usual.
That’s what we so often do to avoid uncomfortable truths about the prejudice
that still infects our society, to settle for symbolic gestures without
following up with the hard work of more lasting change – that’s how we lose our
way again.”
Friends, we cannot lose our way
again. We must find ways to enter into the need for repentance – it may start
with education, perhaps a discussion group here at church, or reading books on
the topic, or building a relationship with a person or group of people who look
different from you. Please, if you have ideas about how we as a community might
continue this conversation, don’t hesitate to talk to me about it; I am eager
to walk this road with you. But for today, we begin with acknowledgment and
with prayer. Let us pray…
God of restoration and wholeness, the tendency to separate ourselves from
the earth’s ills is so strong in us, we sometimes don’t even realize when we do
it. Grant us a spirit of wholeness, of relationship-building, of restoration,
so that we might truly see all people as our brothers and sisters, and
work together to build up the kingdom of God. In the name of the Father and the
Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.